|
1.3 EFFECT OF TILLER NUMBERS AT PLANTING ON GROWTH
The target is to improve materials for transplanting out earlier
than 4 months in the nursery but still maintaining the same good
root mass at the time of transplanting. This attempts to find
out whether quality planting materials can be produced in a shorter
time by using more tillers as starting material.
- Trial 1
This trial compares the use of 1, 3 or 5 tillers at the time
of planting into polybags. Harvesting of plants were carried
out at 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks after planting. On each occasion,
10 plants were randomly selected from each treatment, roots washed,
photographed, the number of new tillers counted and the dry weights
determined. The data are summarised in Table 1 and Figure
1. Readers are referred to the detailed discussions recorded
in the video tape.
Plants starting with 5 tillers have lower number of new tillers
compared with those started with 3 tillers or 1 tiller. Besides
it is difficult to get 5 tillers in a clump without resorting
to usage of the more matured culms; and the older the materials,
the slower they are at producing new groth. Therefore, to use
5 tillers will include using older culms which are not the best
for use in the production of quality planting nursery. The usage
of 5 tillers is also a wastage of materials with little advantage
gained.
Polybag plants with 1 tiller as starting material produces
new tillers faster. This supports my earlier work that we should
use good young active tillers for early growth.
The amount of roots produced by polybags with starting material
of 3 tillers have more root mass after 8 weeks than those of
1 tiller after 10 or 12 weeks. Where root system is concerned,
8 weeks with 3 tillers can easily substitute for 12 weeks with
1 tiller starting material.
- Trial 2
Polybag plants produced from 1 tiller and 3 tillers were planted
into the ground. There was not much difference in plants started
with 1 tiller compared with those from 3 tillers. However, those
plants started with 3 tillers are more uniform than plants started
with 1 tiller. On that score alone, it would be advisable to
use 3 tillers as starting materials.
- Trial 3
This compares the performance of polybag plants with bare
root slips. Those slips with more than 5 tillers were faster
growing than those with only 3 tillers, but even those started
with more than 5 tillers have much less roots than container
plants. For container plants there was not much difference in
growth from those started with 3 tillers, compared with those
started with 1 tiller, the reason being that these plants were
left for 15 weeks in the nursery. The 3 tillers starting materials
was more meant for 8 weeks nursery time when it would have gained
an advantage over starting materials of 1 tiller.
TABLE 1 EFFECT OF TILLER NUMBERS AT PLANTING ON GROWTH
AT VARIOUS WEEKS AFTER PLANTING
|
Weeks |
Tiller number |
Number of new tillers |
Dry weights (g) |
|
Tillers |
Total |
|
New |
Old |
Tillers |
Roots |
Total Plant |
|
4 |
1 |
2.2 |
0.28a |
2.78c |
3.06c |
0.94c |
4.00c |
|
|
3 |
2.6 |
0.93a |
9.06b |
9.99b |
2.43b |
12.42b |
|
|
5 |
1.8 |
0.48a |
14.59a |
15.07a |
3.99a |
19.06a |
|
|
s.e. (± )
LSD (P<0.05) |
|
0.196
- |
0.434
1.26 |
0.553
1.60 |
0.168
0.49 |
0.684
1.98 |
|
6 |
1 |
4.9 |
2.37a |
3.46c |
5.84c |
1.70c |
7.54c |
|
|
3 |
2.3 |
0.76b |
9.24b |
10.00b |
3.08b |
13.08b |
|
|
5 |
3.3 |
1.42ab |
14.82a |
16.24a |
4.95a |
21.19a |
|
|
s.e. (± )
LSD (P<0.05) |
|
0.340
0.99 |
0.608
1.77 |
0.697
2.02 |
0.244
0.71 |
0.897
2.60 |
|
8 |
1 |
5.8 |
4.12a |
3.34c |
7.46c |
2.29c |
9.76c |
|
|
3 |
3.2 |
1.82b |
10.67b |
12.49b |
4.23b |
16.72b |
|
|
5 |
3.5 |
1.84b |
16.58a |
18.42a |
5.57a |
23.99a |
|
|
s.e. (± )
LSD (P<0.05) |
|
0.566
1.64 |
0.936
2.72 |
1.194
3.47 |
0.371
1.08 |
1.529
4.44 |
|
10 |
1 |
4.3 |
7.12a |
3.74c |
10.85c |
3.39c |
14.24c |
|
|
3 |
5.3 |
3.96b |
13.03b |
16.99b |
5.34b |
22.33b |
|
|
5 |
5.4 |
3.29b |
20.80a |
24.09a |
7.11a |
31.21a |
|
|
s.e. (± )
LSD (P<0.05) |
|
0.945
2.74 |
0.611
1.77 |
1.097
3.18 |
0.293
0.85 |
1.282
3.72 |
|
12 |
1 |
6.2 |
7.29a |
4.72c |
12.01c |
3.44c |
15.45c |
|
|
3 |
5.2 |
4.19a |
11.76b |
15.96b |
6.26b |
22.22b |
|
|
5 |
5.4 |
4.27a |
19.46a |
23.72a |
7.58a |
31.31a |
|
|
s.e. (± )
LSD (P<0.05) |
|
1.187
- |
0.692
2.01 |
1.309
3.80 |
0.388
1.13 |
1.658
4.81 |
Means with same subscript alphabet are not
significantly different at P<0.05
 |
|